<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarion&#8217;s Architecture For The Modern Chef</title>
	<link>http://www.pimpmyclarion.com/2007/05/02/clarions-architecture-for-the-modern-chef/</link>
	<description>It's Not Your Daddy's Spreadsheet</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Not Impressed</title>
		<link>http://www.pimpmyclarion.com/2007/05/02/clarions-architecture-for-the-modern-chef/#comment-51</link>
		<author>Not Impressed</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pimpmyclarion.com/2007/05/02/clarions-architecture-for-the-modern-chef/#comment-51</guid>
					<description>This isn't architecture.
This like saying google's architecture is
Database
Web
Browser

Give me a break, posts like this one give Clarion a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t architecture.<br />
This like saying google&#8217;s architecture is<br />
Database<br />
Web<br />
Browser</p>
<p>Give me a break, posts like this one give Clarion a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.pimpmyclarion.com/2007/05/02/clarions-architecture-for-the-modern-chef/#comment-52</link>
		<author>Stu</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pimpmyclarion.com/2007/05/02/clarions-architecture-for-the-modern-chef/#comment-52</guid>
					<description>I've found (spending time with people who are new to Clarion, and even the odd non-programmer who might one day become a programmer) that people like having a simple understanding of how Clarion fits together. Obviously not everyone, maybe not even most people.

If you don't agree with my picture of clarion's arcitecture .. cool. Put your own up somewhere. Make a site. Get it out there. 

If you don't agree with people needing a simple understanding .. cool. Get back in the box and continue life your way. 

If you're having a laugh .. cool. I'm a jovial fellow, and will laugh along with you.

If you're just being antagnostic however .. pull your head back in. And next time, at least have the gonads to put your real name and email down so we might continue the conversation. I'm happy to be wrong about things. If you think I've missed the ballpark, let me know where. Offer some constructive criticism. Otherwise, if you comment on here such as you have, I'll just take it to you. 

The main desire of this website is to be (mostly for when Clarion 7 is released) a beginning place for people to come who are new to Clarion. A beginner's web presence, a place for some ideas .. plus just news. 

Now I'm done being polite. You sir (or madam) are the reason Clarion has a bad name.

Why?

Because you think being right is more important than building relationships. Because you think if you don't agree, then it's wrong. Because you cannot see how something so useless as a simple image/explanation could ever be of help to anyone because you think it sucks.

Make your own website. Do something for the community. Show me where I'm wrong. What I could do to be better. To deliver the message better. Then we'll both come out the other end better equipped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found (spending time with people who are new to Clarion, and even the odd non-programmer who might one day become a programmer) that people like having a simple understanding of how Clarion fits together. Obviously not everyone, maybe not even most people.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t agree with my picture of clarion&#8217;s arcitecture .. cool. Put your own up somewhere. Make a site. Get it out there. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t agree with people needing a simple understanding .. cool. Get back in the box and continue life your way. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re having a laugh .. cool. I&#8217;m a jovial fellow, and will laugh along with you.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re just being antagnostic however .. pull your head back in. And next time, at least have the gonads to put your real name and email down so we might continue the conversation. I&#8217;m happy to be wrong about things. If you think I&#8217;ve missed the ballpark, let me know where. Offer some constructive criticism. Otherwise, if you comment on here such as you have, I&#8217;ll just take it to you. </p>
<p>The main desire of this website is to be (mostly for when Clarion 7 is released) a beginning place for people to come who are new to Clarion. A beginner&#8217;s web presence, a place for some ideas .. plus just news. </p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m done being polite. You sir (or madam) are the reason Clarion has a bad name.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because you think being right is more important than building relationships. Because you think if you don&#8217;t agree, then it&#8217;s wrong. Because you cannot see how something so useless as a simple image/explanation could ever be of help to anyone because you think it sucks.</p>
<p>Make your own website. Do something for the community. Show me where I&#8217;m wrong. What I could do to be better. To deliver the message better. Then we&#8217;ll both come out the other end better equipped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.643 seconds -->
