Ping Clarion 7
Art posted a classic reply to a post entitled “Ping Clarion7″, which was asking if there has been any recent news.
Following is Art’s response,
C:\Documents and Setting\Programming\Clarion> Ping Clarion7
Pinging Clarion7 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.Ping statistics for Clarion7:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),C:\Documents and Settings\Programming\Clarion
Ha ha. I likey.
The Flame
Spend a few minutes on any major gaming forum, and you’ll discover the idea of “Flaming”.
Something like, posting something simple to raise the ire of other folk.
On the newsgroups, it’s almost completely different. And this is mostly because of moderation. Good (and I use that descriptive wordy thing, to differentiate) Gaming Forums have Moderators who keep things under control. They might have ego issues, I’m not sure, but I’ve seen forums run very well.
Anyway, back to the Clarion Newsgroups.
“The Flame” is not someone posting to incite anger. It’s a topic. Any topic that someone has issue with. People might be annoyed about something. They post. Responses flow in, opposite. Then the backlash. Peppered with “Let’s not get fired up” posts.
The Flame burns bright, and then ends abruptly, probably carried into the hearts of the people in the middle.
Dan Pressnell had a couple of quite interesting posts. The first generated some .. discussion.
As I was reading through the posts, the solution came to me.
Take down the newsgroups!
Ha ha. No. Seriously. No. Well. Maybe.
What I would like is to see someone bring about VR for everyone, so we can get in a boxing ring, beat the living crap out of each other, then get back to work. Seems to me we (and I’m including myself here) don’t know how to handle heat on the newsgroups.
I’m leaning (not totally given, but “leaning”) toward the Moderation idea. That the discussion is moderated. It’s a community. Any community needs rules. And needs those rules enforced. Arnie did it with awesome calls like “I let him go”. We could do it with some clear rules, and some .. ruling.
I know for most folk it’s an issue of being treated like kids.
But that’s got it the wrong way around. Anarchy might be fine for your mindset, cool. But we’re not a bunch of individuals. We’re a community. So send in the marines already. Well. Perhaps the SAS. Or whatever we have over here in Oz. Start moderating conversations, not because we’re badly behaved children, but because it establishes a level of trust in the community, for new people coming in seeing that things are in order, and for old folk who if they take issue can go talk about it somewhere else.
Clean it up. Only good will come of it. Sure, some winnowing (? not sure if that’s the right word) might occur. This happens.
Anyway, as I step of this high and oh so mighty pulpit, I’ll leave you with something less preachy.
Here’s my rundown of the situation.
4 Responses
Dave Beggs
April 30th, 2007 at 7:44 pm
1Not sure I quite agree.
90% plus of what most people say is drivel, most is fair enough, and a small amount contains real gems.
Not sure why anyone would expect a newsgroup to be any different.
People ask questions that could easily be looked up in he help file…
People give answers some of which are correct …
sticks and stones may break my bones, but newsgroup posts will never hurt me (but they may enlighten, enrage, entertain, and annoy me, just like people in the real world)
Mostly, they entertain :)
Stu
April 30th, 2007 at 9:05 pm
2Dave,
Nice. I think you’re coming from a better perspective that me. That is, wiser.
I agree that the newsgroups are a great place for people to give answers, and find stuff. When I first started (and still) I would scour them for answers.
Moderation doesn’t have to be a bad thing. Doesn’t have to negate the good points that you have mentioned. Although I guess I might be wrong. It’s happened in the past apparently :).
Perhaps moderation is a bad idea. I doubt that it would be implemented anyway, too much ground to cover and things to deal with.
But sometimes the prop within me just wants to bash away with brawn as opposed to calmly stepping back and seeing the reality of the situation.
Cheers, and Thanks again for the conversation.
Dave Beggs
May 1st, 2007 at 8:42 am
3Just thought I’d try to start the first Flame on PimpMyClarion !
Stu
May 1st, 2007 at 8:48 am
4Heh heh. Touche’ my friend. Nicely done. I shall have to think of something less .. “flameyer” .. for the next time.
Perhaps an in-depth discussion with regards to the mating rituals of the norwegian sewer rat. I can’t see that raising much argument. Or interest in any way :). Ha ha.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
RSS Feed
Email Subscription
Must Read!
Busy Posts (30 Days)
Active Folk (30 Days)
Meta
Pimp My Clarion is proudly powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease